Media Summary: Chimaera + Defender vs. triple-attacker Executor: 68 banners Chimaera (Defender reinforcing) vs. triple-attacker Executor (XB, RC, IG-2000): 68 banners Chimaera + Defender vs. triple-attacker Executor: 69 banners
Chimaera Defender Vs Triple Attacker Executor 68 Banners - Detailed Analysis & Overview
Chimaera + Defender vs. triple-attacker Executor: 68 banners Chimaera (Defender reinforcing) vs. triple-attacker Executor (XB, RC, IG-2000): 68 banners Chimaera + Defender vs. triple-attacker Executor: 69 banners Chimaera + Defender vs. R9 triple-attacker Executor (R7 RC, R5 XB, R5 IG-2000): 65 banners Chimaera + Defender (ITF, Vader, Scythe starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 64 banners I probably should have played it safer an called the final reinforcement.
Chimaera Defender Vs Executor: nicely done! [Fleet] Chimaera + Defender (Scythe, ITF, Vader starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 67 banners Not super happy with how I played it towards the end, but was a win Chimaera + Defender (ITF, Vader, Scythe starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 72 banners Chimaera + Defender vs Executor (Triple Attacker Lineup) - TW 20 Banners Chimaera + Defender vs. triple-attacker Executor: 62 banners
Chimaera + Defender vs. R9 triple-attacker Executor (R9 IG-2000, R7 XB, R7 RC): 59 banners [TW] Chimaera + Defender (Scythe, ITF, Vader starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 18 banners Chimaera Defender vs Executor: first attempt Chimaera + Defender (Scythe, Vader, ITF starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 72 banners Chimaera + Defender vs. triple-attacker Executor (RC, XB, IG-2000): 62 banners
![[Fleet] Chimaera + Defender (Scythe, ITF, Vader starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 67 banners](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AODp8-ngEb8/mqdefault.jpg)
![[TW] Chimaera + Defender (Scythe, ITF, Vader starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 18 banners](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Wm7QUQMJ0FE/mqdefault.jpg)
