Media Summary: Chimaera Defender vs Executor IG2000: easy! For some reason I had thought this was the Chimaera (Defender reinforcing) vs. triple-attacker Executor (XB, RC, IG-2000): 68 banners
Chimaera Defender Vs Executor Ig2000 Easy - Detailed Analysis & Overview
Chimaera Defender vs Executor IG2000: easy! For some reason I had thought this was the Chimaera (Defender reinforcing) vs. triple-attacker Executor (XB, RC, IG-2000): 68 banners Chimaera + Defender vs. triple-attacker Executor (IG-2000, RC, XB): 65 banners Chimaera Defender Vs Executor: nicely done! Chimaera + Defender vs. triple-attacker Executor (RC, XB, IG-2000): 62 banners
Chimaera + Defender vs. R9 triple-attacker Executor (R7 RC, R5 XB, R5 IG-2000): 65 banners Not super happy with how I played it towards the end, but was a win [TW] Chimaera + Defender (Scythe, ITF, Vader starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 18 banners The banners here are fairly low (at least Chimaera + Defender (ITF, Vader, Scythe starting) vs. triple-attacker Executor: 64 banners This lineup with IG starting in lieu of XB is an anti-Finalizer lineup, so I thought I would play it safe and use
This split allows you to keep your Executrix counter to Profundity intact, as it doesn't use any ships from that counter. Even with ... SWGOH Fleet - Thrawn Chimaera vs Executor triple attacker lineups (easy win thanks to Tie Defender) Chimaera + Defender vs. R9 triple-attacker Executor (R9 IG-2000, R7 XB, R7 RC): 59 banners